checking for exhaustiveness in switch statements #2
manabug
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
When inferring type from a switch statement, the type system should require that all possible patterns are matched, or at least that there is a default case.